Here are two papers criticizing Korea-U.S. FTA for provisions the authors think will reduce the confidence people can have in the safety of their food supplies. Both are advocacy pieces from groups and persons opposed to the agreement, and neither provides much analysis of it.
Continue reading "The Korea-U.S. FTA, Food Safety, and Food Security" »
William Cooper and Mark Manyin have updated their Congressional Research Service (CRS) report on the Korea-U.S. FTA: The Proposed South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) (July 18, 2007) to reflect the content of the final agreement. Here's the abstract:
Continue reading "Updated CRS Report on the Korea-U.S. FTA" »
The Peterson Institute has released an assessment of the FTA by Jeffrey Schott: The Korea-US Free Trade Agreement: A Summary Assessment (Policy Brief 07-7, August 2007).
Schott is a supporter. This survey is tightly focused on a few issues. Separate sections deal with autos, agriculture, services, the Kaesong industrial complex, implications for trade relations in the Asia-Pacific, and the prospects for ratification in the U.S. Schott doesn't draw on, or add to, the general equilbrium modeling. The abstract:
Continue reading "KFTA Assessment from Jeffrey Schott" »
Marcus Noland explains some of the choices facing Koreans - if they want to continue to grow their economy - in this op-ed: Capitalism in Korea: A Model for the New Millennium (Korea Herald via Peterson Institute, July 24):
Continue reading "What Korea Needs To Do To Continue to Grow" »
The Wall Street Journal editorialized in favor of the FTA today: Trading Without America (August 7). Sure, the deal is a "big new opportunity for American goods," but the Journal editorial seems to place more emphasis the political impacts:
Continue reading "The WSJ Likes the KFTA" »