The trade agreement opens up the Korean legal market to U.S. firms. The biggest Korean firm has just under 300 attorneys, the biggest U.S. firm has over 3,000. Are the Korean firms about to be blown away?
In April 2007 The Korea Times published three stories on the possible impact of the agreement on the Korean law market: For Law Firms, Bigger Is Better (Kim Tong-hyung, April 15, 2007); ‘US Invasion’ Not Likely in Korean Law Market (Kim Tong-hyung, April 15, 2007); In-House Lawyers Take on Enhanced Role (Park Chung-a, April 30, 2007).
These stories were published just after negotiations ended and before the texts were released. It's unclear to me how knowledgeable the reporters' different sources were about the specific content of the agreement. At least one, who served as a consultant to Korean negotiators, was probably quite knowledgeable.
The legal services agreements are in Chapter 12: Cross-Border Trade in Services. The Services Industry Advisory Committee report also contains a discussion of the agreement's impacts on legal services: Report of the Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Services and Finance Industries (April 2007). The Advisory Committee explains that the agreement will be implemented in three phases: