Miguel Quiroga, Thomas Sterner, and Martin Persson find evidence that "lax environmental regulations induce comparative advantages, causing the least-regulated countries to specialize in polluting industries.": Have Countries with Lax Environmental Regulations a Comparative Advantage in Polluting Industries?
We aim to study whether lax environmental regulations induce comparative advantages, causing the least-regulated countries to specialize in polluting industries. The study is based on Trefler and Zhu’s (2005) definition of the factor content of trade. For the econometrical analysis, we use a cross-section of 71 countries in 2000 to examine the net exports in the most polluting industries. We try to overcome three weaknesses in the empirical literature: the measurement of environmental endowments or environmental stringency, the possible endogeneity of the explanatory variables, and the influence of the industrial level of aggregation. As a result, we do find some evidence in favor of the pollution-haven effect. The exogeneity of the environmental endowments was rejected in several industries, and we also find that industrial aggregation matters.
Hat Tip: Research paper review - "Globalisation and the Envuironment"
Thanks for pointing this out. Very useful.
Posted by: Todd Tucker | March 21, 2008 at 09:32 AM
thanks for posting this! :)
Posted by: man hair loss | March 06, 2011 at 08:33 PM