Lorenzo Caliendo and Fernando Parro provide Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA:
In this paper we build into a Ricardian model the role of trade in intermediate inputs, sectoral linkages and differing productivity levels across sectors. The model can be used for both ex-ante and ex-post trade policy evaluation. We also propose a new method to estimate sectoral trade elasticities. Estimation requires only trade and tariff data and does not require the assumption of bilaterally symmetric trade costs. With the model and estimates of sectoral trade elasticities for the year 1993, we evaluate the trade and welfare effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). We do so by incorporating into the model the change in tariffs from 1993 to 2005 to calculate the implied changes in exports and imports. We compare these calculated changes to their observed counterparts and find that the model matches the observed outcomes well. We fi nd that as a consequence of the tariff reductions, real wages increased in all NAFTA countries. Mexico had the largest gains, while Canada and the United States gained relatively more from trade liberalization against the rest of the world than from trade liberalization within NAFTA over the sample period.
A little more detail:
What were the welfare effects of NAFTA? Real wages increased in all NAFTA countries and Mexico had the largest gains. Almost 90% of the welfare gains and half of the increase in real wages for Mexico can be attributed to having access to cheaper intermediate goods. Canada and the United States gained relatively more than Mexico from liberalizing against the rest of the world.
Thanks to Jonathan Dingel (Job market papers in international trade) for the pointer.
What were the welfare effects of NAFTA? Real wages increased in all NAFTA countries and Mexico had the largest gains. Almost 90% of the welfare gains and half of the increase in real wages for Mexico can be attributed to having access to cheaper intermediate goods. Canada and the United States gained relatively more than Mexico from liberalizing against the rest of the world.
Posted by: guanacaste costa rica real estate | July 27, 2010 at 04:37 PM
It is amazing how such simple decisions can effect whole countries- I mean SIMPLE as in logical, calculated and so on... I think that the more Mexico benefits, so ti would be easier fro the US to maintain good relations with this country.
Posted by: Forex Trading | September 13, 2010 at 10:22 AM
Thanks for such an informative article, it's been very useful.
Posted by: donna | May 02, 2011 at 02:22 AM
estimate sectoral trade elasticities. Estimation requires only trade and tariff data and does not require the assumption of bilaterally symmetric trade costs. With the model and estimates of sectoral trade elasticities for the year 1993, we evaluate the trade and welfare effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement
Posted by: new era magasin | May 06, 2011 at 07:47 PM
SEO services India are gaining popularity and Asha Infotech, a renowned company offering web and print media solutions and seo services India are cashing in on this opportunity. With highly skilled SEO experts at Asha Infotech, you can be assured of our SEO services in India.
Posted by: Seo Services India | May 16, 2011 at 02:59 AM
The goal of NAFTA was to eliminate barriers of trade and investment between the US, Canada and Mexico. The implementation of NAFTA on January 1, 1994, brought the immediate elimination of tariffs on more than one half of U.S. imports from Mexico and more than one third of U.S. exports to Mexico.
Posted by: jewish tradition | May 16, 2011 at 03:02 AM
Every decision a government or its officials will do, always has two effects. May it be good or bad, it was agreed by two parties.
Posted by: Liposuction Indiana | May 25, 2011 at 01:02 AM
I think that NAFTA is not such a good thing as you describe it. i mean after all this agreement does hurt our sovereignty.
Posted by: wrapping machine | October 03, 2011 at 07:33 AM